.png)
Introduction
Society often relies on labels like IQ, EQ, and SQ to categorize intelligence — IQ for logical and academic aptitude, EQ for emotional sensitivity and social skills, and SQ for spirituality and ethical depth. But these labels can be misleading and restrictive. What if our cognitive functions — the way our minds naturally process the world — are the real foundation behind how we engage with each type of intelligence?
As someone with a dominant Introverted Thinking (Ti) function, I’ve discovered that intelligence isn't a one-size-fits-all concept. Even those who don't excel in STEM fields may possess a deep, thoughtful intelligence that simply expresses itself differently.
---
The Limits of Traditional Labels
STEM is often viewed as the pinnacle of intelligence — if you're good at math or science, you're considered "smart." Those who don't excel in these areas are often assumed to be emotionally or socially intelligent instead, getting lumped into the EQ category.
But this binary categorization does a disservice to the complex and diverse ways people process information. People can be intellectually gifted in non-STEM fields. Intelligence isn’t confined to lab coats and numbers — it can also be found in empathetic insights, philosophical reasoning, and spiritual depth.
---
Cognitive Functions: Thinking vs. Feeling
In Jungian typology, every individual has a unique cognitive function stack that governs how they perceive and judge the world. Two major judging functions are Thinking (T) and Feeling (F), and each can be extraverted or introverted.
As someone with dominant Introverted Thinking (Ti), I process the world through internal systems and frameworks. I strive to understand the logic behind every event, motivation, or feeling. But despite being a "Thinker," I score high on empathy in EQ tests — not because I feel easily, but because I understand deeply.
---
Thinking Can Still Feel — Just Differently
For me, emotions are grasped through observation and analysis. I rarely react emotionally in the moment. But when I read about war, see injustice, or watch a well-written show, I often cry. Why? Because I’ve processed the background, the story, the cause and effect. I don’t empathize blindly — I empathize after understanding. That’s how my emotional function works.
This shows how a T-dominant person can develop emotional intelligence — not through instinctive reaction, but through intellectual understanding. It’s still empathy, just filtered through a different lens.
---
Feeling Types in STEM — and Vice Versa
Just like not all Thinkers are scientists, not all Feelers are artists or counselors. Some Feeling types thrive in STEM environments because they approach data and design from a values-based, human-centered perspective.
The key takeaway? Our cognitive function doesn’t define our field, but it shapes how we operate in it.
---
The Depth of Spiritual Intelligence (SQ)
Spiritual intelligence isn’t just about religious rituals or emotional devotion. It’s about understanding life from a higher perspective, applying ethics, self-awareness, and values to navigate life.
In Islam, there's a beautiful term for this: Ulul Albab — people of intellect who reflect, question, and contemplate deeply. They don’t just absorb knowledge; they seek truth. For me, SQ is where faith meets reason.
True spiritual intelligence is both vertical (connection with the Divine) and horizontal (connection with creation). It requires introspection, discipline, and the courage to question.
---
Breaking the Stereotypes
I believe every individual has potential — not based on how well they perform on standardized tests, but on what genuinely interests them. Rather than forcing students to conform to narrow academic categories, we should explore their preferences and nurture their unique intelligence.
Tests should not define intelligence solely through STEM lenses. That only leads to unfair comparisons and deep psychological scars. People begin to feel inferior or label themselves as "not smart" — when in fact, they may be intellectuals in philosophy, literature, sociology, or spirituality.
If we must assess intelligence, let’s make it fair and field-specific. Let’s give every student a chance to shine in their own domain.
---
Education Beyond Schooling
Schools classify academics into rigid boxes. But real education is broader than that. It’s about helping individuals find their strengths, refine their minds, and build confidence — not just perform on tests.
School doesn’t always guarantee a future. But true education does — because it empowers students to understand themselves, explore the world meaningfully, and make conscious, confident decisions.
---
Conclusion
We are not just IQ or EQ or SQ. We are layered beings — shaped by how we think, feel, reflect, and grow.
By understanding cognitive functions, respecting individual preferences, and broadening our definition of intelligence, we open the door to a more compassionate, inclusive, and meaningful view of human potential.
Let’s move beyond numbers — and start valuing insight, intention, and individuality.
.png)